SVG VS JPG
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Scalable Vector Graphics and Joint Photographic Experts Group.
SVG
svgVector format for infinite scaling without quality loss.
Pros
- Infinite scalability
- Small text-based files
- Programmable with CSS/JS
Cons
- Not for photos
- Complex rendering for detailed art
JPG
jpgUniversal image format with lossy compression, perfect for photography.
Pros
- Small file size
- Universal compatibility
- Adjustable compression levels
Cons
- Lossy compression (quality degrades)
- No transparency support
- No animation
When SVG wins
Stay with SVG when you need logos or icons. Its strengths center on infinite scalability and a feature set native to W3C.
When JPG wins
Choose JPG when your workflow prioritizes web images or digital photography. It delivers small file size plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | SVG | JPG |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/svg+xml | image/jpeg |
| Developer | W3C | Joint Photographic Experts Group |
| Release Year | 2001 | 1992 |
| Best For | Logos, Icons, Illustrations | Web images, Digital photography, Email attachments |
Need to switch?
Where SVG still wins
Keep SVG when you need infinite scalability and workflows depend on logos / icons. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship JPG deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .svg glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use JPG for web images while archiving originals as SVG.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.