TIFF VS WebP
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Tagged Image File Format and Web Picture Format.
TIFF
tiffHigh-quality format used in professional photography and publishing.
Pros
- Lossless compression
- Layers support
- CMYK support for print
Cons
- Very large files
- Not supported by web browsers
WebP
webpModern format providing superior compression for web performance.
Pros
- Superior compression (30% smaller than JPG)
- Supports transparency
- Supports animation
Cons
- Not supported by very old browsers
- Complex encoding
When TIFF wins
Stay with TIFF when you need professional printing or scanning. Its strengths center on lossless compression and a feature set native to Adobe.
When WebP wins
Choose WebP when your workflow prioritizes modern websites or app assets. It delivers superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | TIFF | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/tiff | image/webp |
| Developer | Adobe | |
| Release Year | 1986 | 2010 |
| Best For | Professional printing, Scanning, Archiving | Modern websites, App assets, Speed optimization |
Need to switch?
Where TIFF still wins
Keep TIFF when you need lossless compression and workflows depend on professional printing / scanning. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship WebP deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .tiff glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use WebP for modern websites while archiving originals as TIFF.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.