WebP VS PSD
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Web Picture Format and Photoshop Document.
WebP
webpModern format providing superior compression for web performance.
Pros
- Superior compression (30% smaller than JPG)
- Supports transparency
- Supports animation
Cons
- Not supported by very old browsers
- Complex encoding
PSD
psdLayered design file supporting masks, smart objects, and high bit depths.
Pros
- Unlimited layers
- High bit-depth color
- Non-destructive effects
Cons
- Requires Adobe apps
- Large file sizes
- Not web friendly
When WebP wins
Stay with WebP when you need modern websites or app assets. Its strengths center on superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and a feature set native to Google.
When PSD wins
Choose PSD when your workflow prioritizes brand systems or motion graphics. It delivers unlimited layers plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | WebP | PSD |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/webp | image/vnd.adobe.photoshop |
| Developer | Adobe | |
| Release Year | 2010 | 1990 |
| Best For | Modern websites, App assets, Speed optimization | Brand systems, Motion graphics, Print layouts |
Need to switch?
Where WebP still wins
Keep WebP when you need superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and workflows depend on modern websites / app assets. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship PSD deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .webp glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use PSD for brand systems while archiving originals as WebP.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.