WebP VS TGA
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Web Picture Format and Truevision TGA.
WebP
webpModern format providing superior compression for web performance.
Pros
- Superior compression (30% smaller than JPG)
- Supports transparency
- Supports animation
Cons
- Not supported by very old browsers
- Complex encoding
TGA
tgaLegacy raster format used in broadcast and game development with optional RLE compression.
Pros
- Supports alpha channel
- Straightforward structure
- Trusted in VFX pipelines
Cons
- Large uncompressed files
- Sparse metadata
- Poor native web support
When WebP wins
Stay with WebP when you need modern websites or app assets. Its strengths center on superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and a feature set native to Google.
When TGA wins
Choose TGA when your workflow prioritizes game textures or broadcast graphics. It delivers supports alpha channel plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | WebP | TGA |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/webp | image/x-tga |
| Developer | Truevision | |
| Release Year | 2010 | 1984 |
| Best For | Modern websites, App assets, Speed optimization | Game textures, Broadcast graphics, VFX matte passes |
Need to switch?
Where WebP still wins
Keep WebP when you need superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and workflows depend on modern websites / app assets. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship TGA deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .webp glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use TGA for game textures while archiving originals as WebP.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.