AVI VS MP4
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Audio Video Interleave and MPEG-4 Part 14.
AVI
aviLegacy multimedia container format by Microsoft.
Pros
- High quality master files
- Simple architecture
Cons
- Huge file sizes
- No streaming support
- Outdated
MP4
mp4The most compatible digital multimedia container for video and audio.
Pros
- Universal compatibility
- Good compression/quality balance
- Streaming support
Cons
- Compression is lossy
- Editing requires re-encoding
When AVI wins
Stay with AVI when you need legacy windows software or short uncompressed clips. Its strengths center on high quality master files and a feature set native to Microsoft.
When MP4 wins
Choose MP4 when your workflow prioritizes web video or social media. It delivers universal compatibility plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | AVI | MP4 |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | video/x-msvideo | video/mp4 |
| Developer | Microsoft | MPEG |
| Release Year | 1992 | 2001 |
| Best For | Legacy Windows software, Short uncompressed clips | Web video, Social media, General storage |
Need to switch?
Where AVI still wins
Keep AVI when you need high quality master files and workflows depend on legacy windows software / short uncompressed clips. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship MP4 deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .avi glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use MP4 for web video while archiving originals as AVI.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.