AVIF VS TGA
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between AV1 Image File Format and Truevision TGA.
AVIF
avifNext-gen compression codec derived from AV1 video, offering the best quality-to-size ratio.
Pros
- Best-in-class compression
- HDR support
- 10-bit color depth
Cons
- Slow encoding speed
- Limited software support outside browsers
TGA
tgaLegacy raster format used in broadcast and game development with optional RLE compression.
Pros
- Supports alpha channel
- Straightforward structure
- Trusted in VFX pipelines
Cons
- Large uncompressed files
- Sparse metadata
- Poor native web support
When AVIF wins
Stay with AVIF when you need next-gen web delivery or high-quality streaming assets. Its strengths center on best-in-class compression and a feature set native to Alliance for Open Media.
When TGA wins
Choose TGA when your workflow prioritizes game textures or broadcast graphics. It delivers supports alpha channel plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | AVIF | TGA |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/avif | image/x-tga |
| Developer | Alliance for Open Media | Truevision |
| Release Year | 2019 | 1984 |
| Best For | Next-gen web delivery, High-quality streaming assets | Game textures, Broadcast graphics, VFX matte passes |
Need to switch?
Where AVIF still wins
Keep AVIF when you need best-in-class compression and workflows depend on next-gen web delivery / high-quality streaming assets. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship TGA deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .avif glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use TGA for game textures while archiving originals as AVIF.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.