BMP VS WebP
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Bitmap Image File and Web Picture Format.
BMP
bmpUncompressed raster graphics, high quality but large file size.
Pros
- Uncompressed quality
- Simple structure
- Fast processing
Cons
- Huge file sizes
- No compression
- No web usage
WebP
webpModern format providing superior compression for web performance.
Pros
- Superior compression (30% smaller than JPG)
- Supports transparency
- Supports animation
Cons
- Not supported by very old browsers
- Complex encoding
When BMP wins
Stay with BMP when you need windows system files or legacy software. Its strengths center on uncompressed quality and a feature set native to Microsoft.
When WebP wins
Choose WebP when your workflow prioritizes modern websites or app assets. It delivers superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | BMP | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/bmp | image/webp |
| Developer | Microsoft | |
| Release Year | 1990 | 2010 |
| Best For | Windows system files, Legacy software | Modern websites, App assets, Speed optimization |
Need to switch?
Where BMP still wins
Keep BMP when you need uncompressed quality and workflows depend on windows system files / legacy software. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship WebP deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .bmp glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use WebP for modern websites while archiving originals as BMP.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.