GIF VS JPG
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Graphics Interchange Format and Joint Photographic Experts Group.
GIF
gifSupports simple animations and limited color palette, a classic internet format.
Pros
- Simple animation
- Universal support
- Small size for simple graphics
Cons
- Limited to 256 colors
- No audio
- Inefficient compression for video
JPG
jpgUniversal image format with lossy compression, perfect for photography.
Pros
- Small file size
- Universal compatibility
- Adjustable compression levels
Cons
- Lossy compression (quality degrades)
- No transparency support
- No animation
When GIF wins
Stay with GIF when you need memes or simple banners. Its strengths center on simple animation and a feature set native to CompuServe.
When JPG wins
Choose JPG when your workflow prioritizes web images or digital photography. It delivers small file size plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | GIF | JPG |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/gif | image/jpeg |
| Developer | CompuServe | Joint Photographic Experts Group |
| Release Year | 1987 | 1992 |
| Best For | Memes, Simple banners, Loading spinners | Web images, Digital photography, Email attachments |
Need to switch?
Where GIF still wins
Keep GIF when you need simple animation and workflows depend on memes / simple banners. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship JPG deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .gif glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use JPG for web images while archiving originals as GIF.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.