ICO VS TIFF
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Icon File and Tagged Image File Format.
ICO
icoStandard format used for computer icons and favicons.
Pros
- Contains multiple resolutions
- Standard for Windows/Web icons
Cons
- Limited use case
- Inefficient for general images
TIFF
tiffHigh-quality format used in professional photography and publishing.
Pros
- Lossless compression
- Layers support
- CMYK support for print
Cons
- Very large files
- Not supported by web browsers
When ICO wins
Stay with ICO when you need favicons or desktop icons. Its strengths center on contains multiple resolutions and a feature set native to Microsoft.
When TIFF wins
Choose TIFF when your workflow prioritizes professional printing or scanning. It delivers lossless compression plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | ICO | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/x-icon | image/tiff |
| Developer | Microsoft | Adobe |
| Release Year | 1985 | 1986 |
| Best For | Favicons, Desktop icons | Professional printing, Scanning, Archiving |
Need to switch?
Where ICO still wins
Keep ICO when you need contains multiple resolutions and workflows depend on favicons / desktop icons. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship TIFF deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .ico glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use TIFF for professional printing while archiving originals as ICO.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.