JPG VS BMP
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Joint Photographic Experts Group and Bitmap Image File.
JPG
jpgUniversal image format with lossy compression, perfect for photography.
Pros
- Small file size
- Universal compatibility
- Adjustable compression levels
Cons
- Lossy compression (quality degrades)
- No transparency support
- No animation
BMP
bmpUncompressed raster graphics, high quality but large file size.
Pros
- Uncompressed quality
- Simple structure
- Fast processing
Cons
- Huge file sizes
- No compression
- No web usage
When JPG wins
Stay with JPG when you need web images or digital photography. Its strengths center on small file size and a feature set native to Joint Photographic Experts Group.
When BMP wins
Choose BMP when your workflow prioritizes windows system files or legacy software. It delivers uncompressed quality plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | JPG | BMP |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/jpeg | image/bmp |
| Developer | Joint Photographic Experts Group | Microsoft |
| Release Year | 1992 | 1990 |
| Best For | Web images, Digital photography, Email attachments | Windows system files, Legacy software |
Need to switch?
Where JPG still wins
Keep JPG when you need small file size and workflows depend on web images / digital photography. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship BMP deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .jpg glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use BMP for windows system files while archiving originals as JPG.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.