JPG VS SVG
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Joint Photographic Experts Group and Scalable Vector Graphics.
JPG
jpgUniversal image format with lossy compression, perfect for photography.
Pros
- Small file size
- Universal compatibility
- Adjustable compression levels
Cons
- Lossy compression (quality degrades)
- No transparency support
- No animation
SVG
svgVector format for infinite scaling without quality loss.
Pros
- Infinite scalability
- Small text-based files
- Programmable with CSS/JS
Cons
- Not for photos
- Complex rendering for detailed art
When JPG wins
Stay with JPG when you need web images or digital photography. Its strengths center on small file size and a feature set native to Joint Photographic Experts Group.
When SVG wins
Choose SVG when your workflow prioritizes logos or icons. It delivers infinite scalability plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | JPG | SVG |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/jpeg | image/svg+xml |
| Developer | Joint Photographic Experts Group | W3C |
| Release Year | 1992 | 2001 |
| Best For | Web images, Digital photography, Email attachments | Logos, Icons, Illustrations |
Need to switch?
Where JPG still wins
Keep JPG when you need small file size and workflows depend on web images / digital photography. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship SVG deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .jpg glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use SVG for logos while archiving originals as JPG.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.