MOV VS FLV
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between QuickTime Movie and Flash Video.
MOV
movMultimedia framework developed by Apple, common in editing.
Pros
- Professional editing standard
- Alpha channel support (ProRes)
- High quality
Cons
- Large file sizes
- Compatibility issues on Windows
FLV
flvLegacy streaming container widely used before HTML5 video adoption.
Pros
- Small file sizes
- Progressive playback
- Easy to embed in legacy players
Cons
- Deprecated technology
- No iOS/Android support
- Must be converted for modern browsers
When MOV wins
Stay with MOV when you need video editing or apple devices. Its strengths center on professional editing standard and a feature set native to Apple.
When FLV wins
Choose FLV when your workflow prioritizes legacy archives or intranet training portals. It delivers small file sizes plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | MOV | FLV |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | video/quicktime | video/x-flv |
| Developer | Apple | Macromedia |
| Release Year | 1991 | 2002 |
| Best For | Video editing, Apple devices, Post-production | Legacy archives, Intranet training portals |
Need to switch?
Where MOV still wins
Keep MOV when you need professional editing standard and workflows depend on video editing / apple devices. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship FLV deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .mov glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use FLV for legacy archives while archiving originals as MOV.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.