MOV VS MP4
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between QuickTime Movie and MPEG-4 Part 14.
MOV
movMultimedia framework developed by Apple, common in editing.
Pros
- Professional editing standard
- Alpha channel support (ProRes)
- High quality
Cons
- Large file sizes
- Compatibility issues on Windows
MP4
mp4The most compatible digital multimedia container for video and audio.
Pros
- Universal compatibility
- Good compression/quality balance
- Streaming support
Cons
- Compression is lossy
- Editing requires re-encoding
When MOV wins
Stay with MOV when you need video editing or apple devices. Its strengths center on professional editing standard and a feature set native to Apple.
When MP4 wins
Choose MP4 when your workflow prioritizes web video or social media. It delivers universal compatibility plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | MOV | MP4 |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | video/quicktime | video/mp4 |
| Developer | Apple | MPEG |
| Release Year | 1991 | 2001 |
| Best For | Video editing, Apple devices, Post-production | Web video, Social media, General storage |
Need to switch?
Where MOV still wins
Keep MOV when you need professional editing standard and workflows depend on video editing / apple devices. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship MP4 deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .mov glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use MP4 for web video while archiving originals as MOV.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.