MP4 VS FLV
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between MPEG-4 Part 14 and Flash Video.
MP4
mp4The most compatible digital multimedia container for video and audio.
Pros
- Universal compatibility
- Good compression/quality balance
- Streaming support
Cons
- Compression is lossy
- Editing requires re-encoding
FLV
flvLegacy streaming container widely used before HTML5 video adoption.
Pros
- Small file sizes
- Progressive playback
- Easy to embed in legacy players
Cons
- Deprecated technology
- No iOS/Android support
- Must be converted for modern browsers
When MP4 wins
Stay with MP4 when you need web video or social media. Its strengths center on universal compatibility and a feature set native to MPEG.
When FLV wins
Choose FLV when your workflow prioritizes legacy archives or intranet training portals. It delivers small file sizes plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | MP4 | FLV |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | video/mp4 | video/x-flv |
| Developer | MPEG | Macromedia |
| Release Year | 2001 | 2002 |
| Best For | Web video, Social media, General storage | Legacy archives, Intranet training portals |
Need to switch?
Where MP4 still wins
Keep MP4 when you need universal compatibility and workflows depend on web video / social media. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship FLV deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .mp4 glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use FLV for legacy archives while archiving originals as MP4.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.