WebM VS AVI
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Web Media and Audio Video Interleave.
WebM
webmOpen media file format optimized for the web.
Pros
- Open source (royalty-free)
- Optimized for HTML5
- Good transparency support
Cons
- Less support on mobile/legacy devices than MP4
AVI
aviLegacy multimedia container format by Microsoft.
Pros
- High quality master files
- Simple architecture
Cons
- Huge file sizes
- No streaming support
- Outdated
When WebM wins
Stay with WebM when you need html5 video or web background videos. Its strengths center on open source (royalty-free) and a feature set native to Google.
When AVI wins
Choose AVI when your workflow prioritizes legacy windows software or short uncompressed clips. It delivers high quality master files plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | WebM | AVI |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | video/webm | video/x-msvideo |
| Developer | Microsoft | |
| Release Year | 2010 | 1992 |
| Best For | HTML5 video, Web background videos | Legacy Windows software, Short uncompressed clips |
Need to switch?
Where WebM still wins
Keep WebM when you need open source (royalty-free) and workflows depend on html5 video / web background videos. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship AVI deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .webm glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use AVI for legacy windows software while archiving originals as WebM.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.