WebP VS DNG
The ultimate comparison guide. Understanding the technical differences between Web Picture Format and Digital Negative.
WebP
webpModern format providing superior compression for web performance.
Pros
- Superior compression (30% smaller than JPG)
- Supports transparency
- Supports animation
Cons
- Not supported by very old browsers
- Complex encoding
DNG
dngOpen RAW photography format that preserves sensor data for non-destructive editing.
Pros
- Lossless archiving
- Rich metadata
- Broad camera compatibility
Cons
- Large files
- Requires post-processing
- Previewing can be slow
When WebP wins
Stay with WebP when you need modern websites or app assets. Its strengths center on superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and a feature set native to Google.
When DNG wins
Choose DNG when your workflow prioritizes photography archives or lightroom workflows. It delivers lossless archiving plus modern compression perks.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | WebP | DNG |
|---|---|---|
| MIME Type | image/webp | image/x-adobe-dng |
| Developer | Adobe | |
| Release Year | 2010 | 2004 |
| Best For | Modern websites, App assets, Speed optimization | Photography archives, Lightroom workflows, Long-term storage |
Need to switch?
Where WebP still wins
Keep WebP when you need superior compression (30% smaller than jpg) and workflows depend on modern websites / app assets. Link those teams directly to the converter above so they can ship DNG deliverables without leaving their browser.
- • Reference the .webp glossary from this page.
- • Embed the conversion CTA in docs, wikis, and onboarding runbooks.
- • Use DNG for photography archives while archiving originals as WebP.
Keep crawlers in the conversion hub
Link this comparison to the relevant tool, glossary, and documentation pages so every crawl discovers a monetizable route.